Why Matthijs de Ligt’s handball was a penalty but Rayan Ait-Nouri’s was not- Premier league

The Premier League’s explanation for why Rayan Ait-Nouri did not give up a penalty during Wolves‘ 3-0 loss to Nottingham Forest on Monday night has left fans perplexed.
Referee Peter Bankes turned away calls for a spot-kick when Ola Aina’s cross struck Ait-Nouri on his arm, causing the Black Country team to lose for the first time under new manager Vitor Pereira. Fortunately, they did not lose more.After reviewing the event, VAR accepted the on-field ruling.

Many supporters questioned why, after Sunday’s 2-2 draw between Manchester United and Liverpool, the Wolves player escaped punishment while Matthijs de Ligt did not.

When De Ligt extended his arm in an unusual position to block Alexis Mac Allister’s header, he was disciplined. VAR’s explanation of both incidents has only increased online indignation.
Ait-Nouri was exempt from penalty after the Molineux incident because it was determined that his arm was in a natural posture when the ball impacted, according to a tweet from the Premier League Match Centre account.
This is in spite of the fact that when Aina’s cross was headed his way, the defender seemed to be drawing his arm in toward the ball.

The Dutchman’s arm was in an abnormal position when the ball struck him, which was the reason stated the day before for De Ligt’s penalty concede even though Michael Oliver had not initially granted one.

READ MORE: https://sportupdates.co.uk/

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*